AI that supports scholarly judgement
An AI-powered research workflow with people in control
Dryfta adds practical assistance at defined points in the research journey: improving abstract quality, supporting review, recommending presentation formats, shaping the programme and extending knowledge after the event. Outputs remain reviewable, while scientific and operational decisions stay with your team.
AI capabilities at a glance
Practical assistance across the research lifecycle
These tools support different stages, from submission and review to programme construction and the post-event archive. Your team can configure the capabilities that fit its policies and workflow.
Clear academic governance
Faster assistance without changing accountability
People make the decision
Virtual assessments do not merge into human scores. Acceptance, format and programme decisions remain with the committee.
Outputs can be reviewed
Suggestions and warnings appear as work for a reviewer or programme chair to examine before anything is approved.
Use follows event policy
Your team decides where AI assistance is enabled, how outputs are checked and which roles may use them.
Submission quality
Improve submission readiness
Help authors address configured quality issues before their work enters formal peer review.
AI abstract quality checks
Start at submission, before avoidable problems reach the review queue. Organisers choose which abstract fields should be checked. Dryfta can then assess configured quality measures such as clarity, relevance, structure and language, and can include grammar or plagiarism checks when those options are enabled. Authors receive practical feedback while they can still revise their work.
Explore the related toolsReview support
Support review and format decisions
Add advisory analysis while human reviewers and the scientific committee retain authority over scores and decisions.
AI reviewer assistance
Create up to three Virtual Reviewer profiles with relevant expertise, language and submission preferences. They use the event’s existing review form and criteria to provide an advisory assessment. Their ratings remain separate from human scores, can be compared side by side, and do not change the official result. A Virtual Reviewer can also abstain when a submission is outside its configured scope or cannot be assessed responsibly.
Explore the related toolsAI recommendation of presentation format
Use the submission and the event’s available presentation types to produce a format recommendation for committee review. The suggestion can help distinguish work that is better suited to an oral presentation, poster, short talk or another configured format. It is a planning aid: programme chairs review the recommendation alongside scientific merit, reviewer comments, capacity and the aims of each track.
Explore the related toolsRequested and recommended format mismatch detection
Compare the presentation format requested by the author with the format recommended during review. When they differ, Dryfta highlights the record for programme staff instead of allowing the disagreement to disappear inside comments or spreadsheets. The committee can then confirm the final format and communicate it clearly to the author.
Explore the related toolsProgramme planning
Shape the scientific programme
Turn accepted work into coherent session proposals and a timetable that organisers can review and approve.
AI topic clustering
Once decisions are available, analyse accepted submissions for meaningful subject relationships and propose clusters of related work. This gives programme chairs a structured starting point even when authors have used different terminology for similar ideas. Chairs can review, rename, split or combine the proposed clusters before using them in the programme.
Explore the related toolsAI session builder
Turn approved topic clusters into proposed sessions using the event’s accepted submissions and presentation formats. The draft can give each session a coherent group of papers and a workable starting structure. Programme staff remain responsible for checking balance, naming the session, assigning chairs, choosing presentation order and approving the final composition.
Explore the related toolsAI schedule conflict checks
Review the proposed programme before publication and flag timing conflicts that need attention. Checks can help programme staff find overlapping commitments involving speakers, chairs, rooms or related programme constraints. Each warning remains a prompt for an organiser to resolve; the approved timetable stays under the programme team’s control.
Explore the related toolsKnowledge archive
Extend knowledge after the event
Make recorded discussion easier to revisit through reviewed summaries and visual topic discovery.
AI transcript summary
After a recorded or transcribed session, create a readable summary of the main points, discussion and conclusions. The summary gives participants and organisers a quicker way to understand the session without reading the full transcript. It should be reviewed before publication, especially where specialist terminology, attribution or sensitive discussion requires careful human checking.
Explore the related toolsAI keyword cloud
Extract the most important and frequently discussed terms from a session transcript and present them as a visual keyword cloud. Larger terms indicate stronger prominence in the discussion, helping readers scan the session’s themes at a glance. The cloud complements the transcript and summary; it is a discovery aid rather than a substitute for the scholarly record.
Explore the related toolsConfiguration that follows your policy
Start where assistance removes the most pressure
Not every event needs every AI tool in the same way. We review submission volume, review structure, presentation formats and publication policy with you to demonstrate the right configuration. Availability of individual tools may depend on plan, configuration and project scope.
- Define where assistance is advisory and who reviews it
- Use the event’s own review form and programme criteria
- Review outputs before a decision or publication
Dryfta KSA
See where AI can support your research-event workflow
Share your call size, review structure and programme plan for a practical demonstration focused on the points that matter to your team.